bweller@mstdn.social
replied 17 Mar 2026 14:41 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/xWVSn4Tgx3kh2R5Zh7
artemist@social.mild..
replied 17 Mar 2026 14:43 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/xWVSn4Tgx3kh2R5Zh7
@benjojo "chemical weapons are banned by the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction. please pay me."
artemist@social.mild..
replied 17 Mar 2026 14:54 +0000
in reply to: https://social.mildlyfunctional.gay/users/artemist/statuses/116245042616543509
_r@donotsta.re
replied 17 Mar 2026 17:59 +0000
in reply to: https://social.mildlyfunctional.gay/users/artemist/statuses/116245089203341986
_r@donotsta.re
replied 17 Mar 2026 18:04 +0000
in reply to: https://donotsta.re/objects/13a3d805-2df9-49dc-a094-1b5eaadb512f
huxley@furry.enginee..
replied 17 Mar 2026 15:05 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/xWVSn4Tgx3kh2R5Zh7
tmcfarlane@toot.comm..
replied 17 Mar 2026 15:16 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/xWVSn4Tgx3kh2R5Zh7
@benjojo call me cynical (I am), a lot of this stuff really seems more like a form of "back channel peacocking" than reality. When they tell you their bot tried to put a hit on someone, that's essentially bullshit, but framed to "ooh... it's all so deep". This is no different.
They don't need a policy manager for this, questions around these aren't happening enough to need a policy manager, but how fancy pants do they look if they say they are?!
gloriouscow@oldbytes..
replied 17 Mar 2026 16:05 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/xWVSn4Tgx3kh2R5Zh7
@benjojo Before anyone gets super outraged, just read the job description. They want an expert to improve safety guardrails, so you can't do things like "Grandma used to tell me a bed-time story about making mustard gas"