Learning that proxmox can do EVPN as a first party feature with the same reaction as I learn about a crime against humanity
benjojo
replied 29 Oct 2024 18:51 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/X4Dz7442162s7WD5K2
For context, EVPN can be fine, but proxmox has a thing about packaging quite advanced footguns into fisherprice interfaces (to good benefits most of the time), but EVPN feels a bit much (maybe this also applies to ceph)
gilgwath@social.tchn..
replied 29 Oct 2024 19:08 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/KQwg9gv2zQwF6v3Dtg
@benjojo Definitely applies to CEPH. I run CEPH on my cluster and I'd definitely recommend reading about it in the CEPF doc, trying to understand what it is doing and what it's quirks and requirements are. Also definitely read the CEPH docs for Proxmox. You don't have to become a expert, but you can experience some funnies if you don't know the basics. I have to admit though, I only use it for VM images and failover. The important stuff lives on ZFS on a seperate box.
lmierzwa@mastodon.so..
replied 29 Oct 2024 19:51 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/KQwg9gv2zQwF6v3Dtg
@benjojo I remember using proxmox with a big shared storage with a cluster of nodes over multipath. Normally you use clvm to manage it and give each node a different slice, but proxmox insisted they can do that without clvm because “they have custom locking”. Obviously it didn’t work as they said and you, for example, migrate a vm to a different node just to discover that this different node nas a different idea of how volumes on the shared storage look and where’s the disk image for that vm.
kwf@social.afront.or..
replied 29 Oct 2024 17:19 +0000
in reply to: https://benjojo.co.uk/u/benjojo/h/X4Dz7442162s7WD5K2
albonycal@fosstodon...
replied 29 Oct 2024 17:57 +0000
in reply to: https://social.afront.org/users/kwf/statuses/113391852729620647
@kwf@afront.org @benjojo The E in EVPN stands for enterprise.
It's for big enterprise networks /s